Wireguard unable to access interface no such device. conf file, because he search it in his directory.

Wireguard unable to access interface no such device I was hoping to convert to wireguard but i've spent far too much time trying to solve this. (Fresh, basic, Unable to access interface: No such device iptables v1. EDIT: It does show this in the client log "Unable to access interface: No such device" Maybe its ERROR: (wg0) 2019/12/09 21:53:53 Failed to create TUN device: open /dev/tun: no such file or directory This is because the Wireguard needs access to the device /dev/tun on the host. config file: The normal operation of a VPN is that it creates a separate network: when your machine at 192. 1. @bonienl After further troubleshooting what i determined that is the trigger in the docker section that allows me to access the internet or not is the setting "IPv4 custom network on interface br0 (optional)" if I enable this and start my docker I am unable to use my wireguard to access the internet from my VPN. RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory The modules loaded and the interface was there, but could not be set up: No such file or directory (Yes, wlanB is correct. pi@raspberrypi:~ $ sudo wg-quick up wg0-client [#] ip link add wg0-client type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0-client Cannot find device "wg0-client" The Wireguard server side has been working for a while with other devices, so I do not paste the Hello to the AlmaLinux community, I have been using AlmaLinux for a number of months and among others, I could use Wireguard (packages installed : kmod-wireguard, wireguard-tools). This will add a route to 192. I understand that if you are When I try sudo -i I can switch to root but when I try my showconf command above I get Unable to access interface: No such device. Share. 0/0, ::/0 wg showconf vpn Unable to access interface: No such device dex@avem:~$ docker run --restart unless-stopped --cap-add net_admin --cap-add sys_module -v /etc/wireguard:/etc/ wireguard -p 55555:55555/udp cmulk/wireguard-docker:buster Tue Mar 31 18:09:26 UTC 2020: Starting Wireguard /etc/wireguard/wg0. I created a wireguard-container and Inow want to start the wireguard-server with the command “wg-quick up wg0”. However something seems to go wrong with the pi. x which is wireguards interface. Remedies I've tried: I've got a UDM Pro set up with a Wireguard VPN server. service: Main process exited, code=exited, sta [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard Error: Unknown device type. I am using RHEL 5. add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether2 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether3 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether4 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether5 /ip neighbor discovery-settings I have PiVPN WireGuard installed on a Debian 10 Linux container on Proxmox and pivpn -d shows that "WireGuard is not running" and also "WireGuard is not listening" I cannot access the internet when connected to the WireGuard VPN. Though the connection does not: RX/TX 0/0. 1/24. I downloaded the configs and put them in the correct directory. You can see the VPN client in "Client Devices" area (the name of the device is also one word, 8 characters long). I'm able to connect to the server via wireguard and ssh into it through the wireguard tunnel (in fact that's the only way I'm able to ssh into it, recently it just stopped responding to requests from outside my LAN), but I'm unable to access the internet or any other devices on my LAN. If the LAN IP of the Ubuntu VM is 192. 0-STABLE OpenSSL 1. Have a good day Hi, I'm trying to access LAN devices over the Wireguard client on my OpenWRT router. ) Eventually figured out the system was also missing the usual array of firmware in /lib/firmware add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether2 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether3 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether4 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether5 /ip neighbor discovery-settings Under 3 firmware my iPhone and Macinosh Wireguard clients could access the LAN of my GliNet Home Routers Wireguard Server. 0/32 and Here is my solution for this issue: on the host machine, run sudo modprobe ip_tables && sudo modprobe iptable_nat; to the container, add the following enviroment variables: WG_POST_UP='iptables -A FORWARD -i %i I find that I am unable to browse to my router on 192. sudo wg show wg0. 1-noarch:cxx Had the same problem as you (windows 10: "unable to create wintun interface"). conf Warning: `/etc/wireguard/wg0. There were initially some installation challenges at some stage, but it has worked well over the last three months or so, but suddenly it stopped working : I am getting Dear all, Just updated to: OPNsense 22. Unable to access interface: Protocol I don't use PreDown rules because 1) I don't want Transmission to be able to communicate with the internet if WireGuard goes down, e. - Assigning an interface is required. You signed in with another tab or window. If one these two work, then this is due to podman or SELinux being more restrictive than docker I guess. I get these same errors no matter what server I try. Wireguard server is working correctly as I have other devices working. wg0 -m 0 -x Failed to resolve interface "tun": No such device [#] ip After that you can try bring up the wg0 interface. ) - The NAT rule is not required. If I install the kmod-wireguard and wireguard-tools packages and try to get the interface up it throws this back at me: # wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot I've managed to setup a DIY VPN for anonymous/encrypted web browsing using wireguard. The wg0 interface is missing. I can also access the internet on the laptop, through the VPN. and the LAN devices connected to the router have IP address within the 192. Here is the configuration that worked: Internal LAN IP of firewall: 192. Restart your tunnel on the laptop and check routing table ("route -n" on Linux, "route print" on Windows) - you should now have a route to the 192. x for the client, and 192. The server runs perfectly fine as I can connect my phone to it. google. So I wanted to reset everything Hello All, I'm a struggling RHEL noob trying to configure network interfaces for use as a bridging firewall. 9. 6 for IA-64 on an HP Integrity RX-2600. The server is on a cloud based VPS, with port forwarding & DNS, so that all works fine. 0/24, or 10. When I am at my girlfriends place (she has a FritzBox Fon WLAN 7390), I can't turn on the WireGuard connection. 0/24 through whatever your Wireguard CIDR block is Hey! I'm able to solve this problem, but I'm not sure if it will work for you. x. While starting it, it gives: $ sudo wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" $ uname -r 3. I have imported . 1m 14 Dec 2021 And already previously I had troubles getting the Wireguard interface up. when I'm home. If you have a specific Keyboard/Mouse/AnyPart that is doing something strange, include the model number i. Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0. Opening the WG port on WAN is sufficient. I do not remember it to get uninstalled unsuccessfuly honestly, but who knows. x for the network devices). I have setup WireGuard on my UDM, and can successfully connect to it. Stack Exchange Network. Unable to access interface: Protocol not suppor Your gateway is the router that connects you to the internet, so it cannot be the network segment address of 192. You can, Try and load wireguard-dkms using ‘modprobe wireguard’ If you updated kernel and have not rebooted your machine. 120. 168. I have a Pi-hole running as a DNS server for ad blocking and also dns-over-https, and have outbound DNS (port 53) blocked on my firewall. elrepo. 7 (nf_tables): mark: bad integer value for option “–mark”, or out of range. 148 dev wg0 [#] ip link set mtu 1420 up dev wg0 [#] resolvconf -a tun. io-init] done. 44 seconds` ^C[#] ip link delete dev wg0. 33. 214. Get early access and see previews of new features. I can connect to the server from LAN and WAN on my Android phone, but I am only able to access other devices when im on LAN connection. administrator@r01:/config$ But it doesn’t fail on query. Here is my /etc/wireguard/wg0. There’s just no results. 2/24 No, I stood up my remote access peers just like I did my site to site tunnels. Everytime I leave house and connect to the server and try to access devices on LAN it just doesnt work. Then I checked if the module is loaded. When setting up a WireGuard client, I set this device as my DNS server. conf' does not exist Unable to access interface: No such device He don't find my *. 0. WG settings on asus Inbound Firewall = - Assigning an interface is required. Please fix the tunnel config /config/wg_confs/wg0. 3 After updating my kubuntu (after that I rebooted my device) to 22. Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" My proxmox container config is attached. Cannot find device "wg0" Modprobe also fails: root@xxx:~# modprobe wireguard Wireguard server no longer responding to requests from devices . Cannot find device "wg0" According to the documentation- a new key-pair needs to be generated for the wireguard interface. Unable to access interface: No such device #169 opened Oct 29, 2022 by EasyBakerFox. Something I have been struggling with for quite some time and I just can not get it right. Ask Question Asked 1 year, 2 months ago. Dez 10 07:24:02 raspberrypi wg-quick[2848]: Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported Dez 10 07:24:02 raspberrypi wg-quick[2848]: [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Dez 10 07:24:02 raspberrypi wg-quick[2848]: Cannot find device "wg0" I reinstalled wireguard-dkms package then everything runs fine. If you ls /dev from the host, you won't see it, but if you stat /dev/tun it is there (one of those invisible device nodes). 6. 1) as recommened by Nord so NetworkManager cannot re-write it. r/Ubiquiti. :53 Issue connecting to Wireguard Linux ubuntu 18. 1 [Interface] PrivateKey = <Private_KEY> Address = 17. If the issue persists, Reinstall WireGuard, Uninstall WireGuard from your system then reinstall it from the official WireGuard. x86_64 Why? I have Wireguard server set up and can access all LAN hosts via the Wireguard VPN and Instantguard. log Wireguard to LAN allow Set your Wireguard CIDR to something that won't collide (for example, 192. If it prints nothing, that means wireguard dkms is not loaded. Error: Unknown device type. I've tried chowning the owner of the file recursively and Since the interface 'venet0:' on my vps is 'UNKNOWN' After that I locally ran the adaption and it finished fine. I hope this will help. Operation not permitted Unable to access interface: Operation not permitted [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find Warning: `/etc/wireguard/wg0. With the static route in my router enabled i can now ping (and access) every device in the remote network, from every device in my local network. I have a debian-based VPS, and a Manjaro client. c. 04. 45. 159:53133 which is the public IP address of the router and the obscure port used by the WireGuard interface which encodes everything else end-to-end, recently I set up WireGuard on my FritzBox 7530 after it updated to FritzOS 07. The issue is, that Wireguard moved from 5. It does not look like wg-quick is running or can find the "wg0" interface. (Fresh, basic, OpenSSH, changed CPU setting and timezone) Unable to access interface: No such device iptables v1. 0/24. I have tried this on SLATE AX, FLINT and Beryl units. If you are using pivpn, the debug command pivpn -d have the options to re-enable Wireguard. yea, in my case I added LAN subnet to the wireguard peer/client that is going to connect to wireguard under the AllowedIPs section. 0/24 and gateway 192. most likely the wireguard kernel module is not loaded in your system. The key lines are Unknown device type and Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported. What can I provide to get to the bottom of this? When im trying to start a vm, i receive this error:" Cannot get interface MTU on 'virbr0': No such device" It seems my virbr0 interface has gone away? Any tips? 🙂 Thank you! Edited June 12, 2020 by Aviv I updated raspbian and reinstalled wireguard and wireguard-dkms and it worked again after a reboot: sudo -i apt-get upgrade apt-get update apt install --reinstall wireguard apt install --reinstall wireguard-dkms reboot. I am using an Ubuntu 22. 04 · Issue #1434 · StreisandEffect/streisand · GitHub; 2. I am wondering if this relates to a new FIREWALL ruleset or ROUTING configuration. When asking a question or stating a problem, please add as much detail as possible. wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard [#] wg setconf wg0 /dev/fd/63 [#] ip -4 address add 192. markson Ive setup wireguard, but its not connecting on a reboot, all I have to do is hit the apply button and everything comes up and works fine. d] starting services [services. Unable to access interface: No such device. After updating my kubuntu (after that I rebooted my device) to 22. 2020-11-22 12:13:49,199 DEBG 'start-script' stderr output: Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported 2020-11-22 12:13:49,200 DEBG 'start-script' stderr output: [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Dear MikroTik-Forum, Since yesterday I try to get my MikroTik Router to work as a WireguardPeer. 0/24 range), install wireguard on it and try to access the IP apt-get install wireguard-tools. RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported. The other issue I tried to rule out is the firewall settings. After some manual testing I have noticed that the command wg show %i fwmark doesn't work, as in I get the output: Unable to access interface: No such device, so the above PostUp and PreDown encounter a problem when they try to mark the ouput of the command. Hope this configuration is helping someone else too. Previously, I had the network interfaces configured successfully, but after a PCI card shuffle, I started getting RTNETLINK messages. 问题描述. (The information such an interface is only necessary for using the WG connection to access the Internet is wrong. 136/24: Our server is still on CentOS 7 and I am trying to use Wireguard on it. 04 I am unable to run the wire guard: sudo wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard [#] wg setconf wg0 /dev/fd/63 [#] ip -4 address add 10. 0-1160. 210. It loves to hack digital stuff around such as radio protocols, access control systems, hardware and more. 2_1-amd64 FreeBSD 13. You switched accounts on another tab or window. I also had set any errant interaction between NetworkManager and Wireguard prevented by creating "unmanaged. (or whatever your wireguard interface is) Description: knottyphone Dynamic endpoint: ticked if youre connecting from outside the network and want to vpn in Keep Alive: 25 Public key: PUBLIC KEY GENERATED BY PHONE WIREGUARD Pre-shared key: leave this blank unless I tried to access the VPN from a laptop through a wireless hotspot on my phone. 2. Did the port forwarding on My Google Nest WiFi as So I setup up an Alias for my Wireguard network defining it as: Wireguard_Networks 10. 1-amd64:core-4. conf file as the Interface. Was probably caused by the last windows update that was installed some days before Hi runfalk, Thanks for the wg synology package! I have a synology DS218+ and with DSM 6. wireguard. I recieve wg-quick: `/etc/wireguard/wg0. 10. 126. . I have a feeling there's something glaringly obvious that I missed, but I cannot think of it. The /dev directory is special, and Docker build steps cannot really put anything there. Setup: RaspberryPi (Wireguard Server via PiVPN) <-> Router ISP <-> MikroTik Router (Wireguard Peer) <-> Local Network Sorry yes, the question was about the network where you are before being connected to the VPN. ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" modprobe spits this back at me: # modprobe wireguard modprobe: FATAL: Module wireguard not found. I had setup my openwrt RPi3 as a travel router which connects home (running a wireguard server). The wireguard client shows successful handshakes. If that 192. This has stopped since upgrading to firmware 4. Is that correct? If so, do you have no Internet connectivity from the Linux server? Are you able to I've got a few networks set up, VPN is connected and on my device that is connected with the VPN, I can still access the Unifi interface by connecting to the IP via browser. 4. 05. conf and restart the container **** [ls. My previous setup was just working fine but we moved to a different place aka different ISP provider etc. Whenever I try to connect, I get the Error-Message no such host is known. 12 . On my client device, I'm tethered to my phone for internet access (wifi is disabled, i. The problem is that as soon as I start the vpn inside my linux guest, I lose access to that machine from the local network. Learn more about Labs. 1/24" WG_ADDR6="fdf1:7610:d152:3a9c::1/64" # Generate and RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported I have installed wireguard-lts also. [services. wg-quick: `/etc/wireguard/wg0. 0/24 as the AllowedIPs. If I try to e Hello friends, I have a little problem with a newly created docker-container (wireguard). conf file from Wireguard, the conf file is definitely working. 28. Unable to access interface: No such device [#] ip link delete dev wg0. I'm not actually trying to reach any particular place from the linux guest which is running wireguard. 77. I have a feeling there's I've got an issue with wireguard. 1. 0. [cont-init. Last edited by goosestepping (2019-09-28 16:17:52) It makes no difference if it's lite or full. You signed out in another tab or window. 0/24) to the AllowedIPs of the remote peer (your laptop). but I am still not able to start wireguard: root@xxx:~# wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard. Anyways, the solution is simple. When my Windows 11 client connects to the Wireguard server, I am able to access both the internet and my local network over the VPN. So for example, my home LAN uses the subnet 192. com, other websites). And, to reiterate, when I port this exact setup over to Docker, it has no problems at all connecting: I am trying to get a wireguard server running on a fresh CentOS 7 vm machine - installed it using the instructions on the official installation page for CentOS 7 - tried both method 2 (standard kernel using ELRepo's pre-built module) and method 3 (non-standard kernels using the DKMS package). conf" within /etc/NetworkManager/conf. Trying again in 1. On Zorin was If your router is in a state where the configuration doesn't match the OS, it is usually quicker to reboot the router than it is to fix the broken state. 6 Linux Kernel to a official kernel module. Such driver code in memory is not something that a Then, you have a Linux server at home, aka another client, that you are attempting to connect to the VPS wireguard server, but you've not connecting. I don't use PreDown rules because 1) I don't want Transmission to be able to communicate with the internet if WireGuard goes down, e. It was working fine one year ago when I used it, but doesn't work now for some reason. 158. 1 yesterday and adding a new client this morning, Wireguard seems to be deactivating itself automatically after about a minute. When plugging into my router via a cable, i'm unable to establish a connection/handshake on connected interface eth0. The Pi4 has automatic updates enabled so I'm not sure if there was any package updates which were installed around the time it stopped working. , shouldn't touch my local network at all). works again. for an update, and 2) the container will be destroyed and recreated for an update so there's no need to "clean up" the previous rules anyway. conf file, because he search it in his directory. Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" . Shouldn't wireguard be included in the newest After setting it up, it can't make or find "wg0" and I cannot understand why. There is a route created for Software: Wireguard Client; Freshly installed DietPi and Wireguard client; Steps to reproduce. d: I've configured wireguard server and client to work using the wifi interface (wlan). Also with my setup, Interfaces->Interface Groups there was a auto setting created when package was installed: WireGuard WireGuard Interface Group (DO NOT EDIT/DELETE!) For Firewall, Firewall->Rules->WireGuard: Software: Wireguard Client; Freshly installed DietPi and Wireguard client; Steps to reproduce. It seems like wireguard isn't able to create a new wireguard interface, as if the $ ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard RNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported . On my intermediate router I cannot capture a I use Xiaomi Redmi Router AX6S, LuCI openwrt-23. Instead, I am trying to retain access to the linux guest from other machines on my network. Remote peer on 4G Configuration of Wireguard Plugin on the unraid server: wg0. X. Not working with DSM 7. There is no longer a wireguard-dkms package offered on CentOS. Address already in use [#] ip link delete dev wg0 root@Server1:~# sudo wg show wg0 This won't apply to your case according to your configs, but i ran into the exact same behavior and thought maybe someone else could use my solution: After testing a lot of different things (reactivating IPv6, building the client from scratch, running with different users, multiple reboots, etc), it turned out that the windows client doesn't seem to like MTU values in Software: Wireguard Client; Freshly installed DietPi and Wireguard client; Steps to reproduce. 8. Run the Following commands : and reboot the system. 1, nor get any internet access. I also use the default LAN address of 192. 1-42962 Trying again in 1. In fact I think all configuration is allright except for the wg-quick When I try to connect with wg-quick, I get these errors: Error: Unknown device type. What causing the problem: Nordvpn or other VPN Application create Network Adapter with type Wireguard (NordLynx) and Wireguard app cannot have Access to the Adapter. Setup is described in the attached image. 1/24 ListenPort = 51820 PrivateKey = <KEY> PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i Something I have been struggling with for quite some time and I just can not get it right. 211 connects to some wireguard vnp (or other vpn), you get a new different IP address in a separate network range, that of the VPN. conf set to Cloudflare unfiltered DNS (1. [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0". New Dietpi installation. root@li1712-156:~# sudo wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" Set your Wireguard CIDR to something that won't collide (for example, 192. I followed the documentation when setting up the server as I did before. I’ve found what I believe to be the keys in /config/auth/ If access to other LAN resources such as an IP camera or a Web server is needed, Unable to modify interface: No such device wg set failed address will be 172. Hello I´ve recently set up wireguard server on mi device, but now when i establish a tunnel, my IP changes to the on of the vpn server, but i cannot access remote LAN of the mikrotik. On Zorin was this not a problem because I write down the Path to my *. If both the network you connect from and the vpn network are in the 192. The problem is as soon as I activate wireguard on Windows 10 I lose access to other computers on the local LAN. Wireguard - unable to use wired interface. conf located in /etc/wireguard/ [Interface] Address = 10. So those two program use the same wintun driver? I have nameservers in an unwritable (chattr +i) resolv. conf of a server: [Interface] Address = 10. wg0 -m 0 -x Failed to resolve interface "tun": No such device [#] ip link delete I ran updates and upgrades today and couldn't get WireGuard up: $ sudo wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard Error: Unknown device type. administrator@r01:/config$ show interfaces wireguard Codes: S - State, L - Link, u - Up, D - Down, A - Admin Down Interface IP Address S/L Description. Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported. Probably afterwards a reboot will be needed. 0/24 routed correctly via our public IP address 172. #!/bin/ash # Install packages opkg update opkg install wireguard luci-proto-wireguard luci-app-wireguard # Configuration parameters WG_IF="wg0" WG_PORT="51820" WG_ADDR="192. The original PCI configuration had a PCI-X to PCI bridge adapter in add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether2 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether3 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether4 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether5 /ip neighbor discovery-settings Hello! I am trying to set up WireGuard using Mullvad. Click Start, click Run, type regedit and click OK Navigate to the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Dhcp There is no longer a wireguard-dkms package offered on CentOS. Hey there, I am having a weird issue with my Wireguard Server/Client setup. After some basic configuration and running raspi-config, I installed wireguard using apt and the debian backport repos, according to a tutorial. I've configured wireguard server and client to work using the wifi interface (wlan). Let me try to clarify. As long as kernel is updated through apt or aptitude you should not run into problems, but if you update kernel with rpi-update you'll likely get newer kernel than what is available through The install completed without issue but I am unable to connect to it. Modified 1 year, Wireguard: unable to access services running inside linux guest from internet when vpn Contribute to runfalk/synology-wireguard development by creating an account on GitHub. Please use our discord server for general support. If issue still exist, you can reinstall wireguard-dkms I'm setting up wireguard on a synology NAS with DSM 7 and using Docker. 0/24 network going through your Wireguard interface. d] 99-custom-scripts: exited 0. What you need to keep in mind is that dkms packages (wireguard-dkms this time) need kernel headers for current kernel you have loaded (uname -a). Hi guys, so I've been trying to set up a wireguard server for a few weeks now with no luck. I have a interface 3 @ 100. :53 bridge interface on the host, assigned a private IP and treated as the network gateway; epair interfaces, with host (a) side configured with no IP and added as members to the bridge, and jail (b) side configured with an IP in the same subnet as the gateway / bridge; jails configured with the bridge IP as default gateway Hi, I configured wireguard in /etc/config/firewall and /etc/config/network using the following script file. On my VPS, which acts as a WG server, Hi! I had the same issue with Wireguard, but on the Orin NX plattform. The keys seem to work as it establishes wireguard add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether2 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether3 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether4 add bridge=bridge comment=defconf ingress-filtering=no interface=ether5 /ip neighbor discovery-settings Something I have been struggling with for quite some time and I just can not get it right. Everything is configured, and I'm able to connect with a client to the server. If the gateway does not have a route to the WireGuard network, you will not receive any data from that network as it will not be able to route it. You want “any” traffic coming in on your physical interface to be routed to the wireguard interface. And I cannot figure out how to go about routing that traffic. I couldn't connect to my home network today using wireguard, so when I used my backup vpn (OpenVPN through my router) and run putty pivpn -c I get pi@raspberrypi:~ $ pivpn -c. So those two program use the same wintun driver? Just installed wireguard-dkms, these applications came along: build-essential cpp cpp-9 dkms dpkg-dev fakeroot g++ g++-9 gcc gcc-9 libalgorithm-diff-perllibalgorithm-diff-xs-perl libalgorithm-merge-perl libasan5 libatomic1 libc-dev-bin libc6-dev libcc1-0 libdpkg-perl libfakeroot libfile-fcntllock-perl libgcc-9-dev libisl21 libitm1 liblsan0 libmpc3 libstdc++-9-dev libtsan0 Creating wireguard from one-click always run well, but suddenly failure: login and run: sudo wg-quick up wg0. Unifi devices are on their own subet, 192. [custom-init] no custom files found exiting [cont-init. I've managed to setup a DIY VPN for anonymous/encrypted web browsing using wireguard. It has worked in my case, I hope it will be helpful to you! Following the install instructions from: https://www. 127. I'm having an issue in configuring a Wireguard site to site vpn network. Now i only have to configure the static route in the remote network, so that remote clients can access the local client, but that's not a big deal^^. For PC questions/assistance. More specifically, I am able to connect from a remote device and the connection is established, but there is no information exchange and no packets transferred. No such device exists (SIOCGIFHWADDR: No such device) I tried to locate the interface: vpnserver@vpnserver:/etc **** wireguard | [custom-init] No custom files found, skipping wireguard | **** Disabling CoreDNS **** wireguard | Warning: -m addrtype ! --dst-type LOCAL -j REJECT Unable to access interface: No such device iptables v1. So I've followed some guides: https: wg0. Follow answered Feb 12, 2024 at 2:03. Everything is working perfectly fine except one thing. Right now I can ping it using other WG peers, but I cannot access local devices. I guess it’s the same procedure for the AGX, like for the Orin NX. However, I am unable to access a network share on my Windows 11 Machine that is on my local network when going through the Wireguard VPN. WireGuard support for some Synology NAS drives. SaveConfig = true Device or resource busy: \my-paid-vpn-endpoint:51820'. However I cannot see any devices on the LAN (both in names 'NAS_home' or IP addresses, which is the reason I set up the VPN in the first place. d] done. So I wanted to reset everything and re-build from scratch. vz7. 1 LTS server to run wg-easy. However, If i disable this then Everything works as expected. Add NETWORK SERVICE full permission to the following Registry keys/folders; HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Dhcp; I am trying to setup a wireguard tunnel to access any device on my LAN. d This is great . But, as long as you've added the Wireguard firewall rules and Outbound NAT, it should work [cont-init. I use portainer to manage my docker containers. 105. Solution:. Sorry guys, my first issue on GitHub, I try to follow the template, please forgive me if it's not totally exhaustive, please ask for any further logs or whatever. My proxmox container config is attached. b. root@firewall:~# wg-quick up firewall [#] ip link add firewall type wireguard [#] wg setconf firewall /dev/fd/63 Temporary failure in name resolution: `example:51820'. 2, then your LAN devices will need a static route with destination 10. I'm sure once I see the solution, it will be something simple but I just don't see it. Have no idea what happened, I have been using WireGuard for over a year with no issues using my PC. conf' is world accessible [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" this is my kernel version: [root@izbp19pke6x0v6ruecuy1yz wireguard]# uname -r 4. Reload to refresh your session. Make sure the tunnel is not disabling the Wi-Fi interface. Let's say I have 5 devices and I want to connect all of them at the same, What I did was add a peer for each client and this works just fine but what if I need to add 5 more what if one of my friends came to me and said: "oh that's cool can you make 5 peers for me too". Solved by reinstalling VMWare and uninstalling it again. conf' is world accessible [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard RTNETLINK Add your home IP range (192. My wireguard client (Android phone) can successfully connect to the Wireguard server, including from outside my LAN (e. The problem is: when the client connects to the Wireguard server, the client can't access the internet (outside world, e. Attached is the wg-quick log. In your particular case @OkanEsen it looks like gluetun would work with --privileged instead of --cap-add=NET_ADMIN. [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard Error: Unknown device type. Running as admin didn't help, but deinstalling, restarting and re-installing helped. Reboot it and retry. Some screenshots: LAN rules LAN host pinging wiregueard peer LAN host pinging peer OPNSense can ping the peer No traffic on wireguard interface when LAN host pinging Route table Wireguard Rules Wireguard to LAN detailed. 37. 5. I can access the router and other local devices still in the location which I am connecting from though. However I can't access anything else on my LAN such as my NAS or HomeAssistant. lsmod | grep wireguard. Apparently a device in /dev isn't a file with data in it, but a placeholder, an address, a pointer, a link to driver code in memory that does something when accessed. 2 installed. 12. 18. Do you guys know what could be the problem. 0/24 network I think that may be the cause of the issue, to test that quickly, if your phone have internet data (it will probably not be in the 192. 1/24 ListenPort = 194 PrivateKey = < Skip to main content. [root@wg-vm ~]# lsb_release -a LSB Version::core-4. 1,1. Feel free to ask any queries. 1/24 ListenPort = The key lines are Unknown device type and Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported. X range. 50. 1/24 , my wireguard subnet is 10. As such, the normal way to handle connecting to network devices is to always use the VPN ip address, since that should be reachable as long Network interfaces may have other names, since the renaming mode is enabled when 1-2 digits are partially taken from the pci number of the network device to generate a specific name. I'm running Windows 10. from phone's cellular data network). Here is my lsmod | grep wireguard output: wireguard 94208 0 curve25519_x86_64 36864 1 wireguard libchacha20poly1305 16384 1 wireguard ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 wireguard udp_tunnel 20480 1 wireguard libcurve25519_generic 49152 2 curve25519_x86_64,wireguard RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported, Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported, Cannot find device "wg0" Need Help I've been trying to troubleshoot OpenVPN, and thought to see if Wireguard was any easier. peer The Wireguard connection is successfully made and I am able to access all web based interfaces on the internal LAN and I can additionally access the internet. x, and my other network is 192. e. Ensure packet forwarding is enabled on your "server" (). Thanks! somehow it I'm trying to work with Wireguard for multiple peers. 2 device is a managed switch I recommend you try an unmanaged switch and let the router hand out DHCP addresses. This is done so that the names of network devices are not connected to the machine by new adapters. I have the same rules for both interface 2 and interface 3 basically just a rule that allows interface 2 and 3 respectively to access interface 1. 20 seconds Device or resource busy: `my-paid-vpn-endpoint:51820'. el7. . 7 (legacy): Couldn't load match `mark':No such file or directory Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more Next, I am going to enable our WireGuard service in firewalld using the firewall-cmd command as follows: {vivek@centos8:~ }$ sudo firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=wireguard --zone=public Turn on masquerading so all traffic coming and going out from 192. 1/20 External IP WAN: a. d Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported [#] ip link delete dev demo Cannot find device "demo" wg-quick: `demo' is not a WireGuard interface **** The module is not working, review the logs. 219-1. log Wireguard to LAN allow RTNETLINK answers: No such process **** All tunnels are now down. I use WireGuard for work so no LORA access in local Automatic1111 and upvotes · comments. And when wireguard-dkms recompilation fails I'm trying to setup "site to peer" wireguard VPN, but can't access asus router or anything behind it from the other side of the VPN. The Wireguard peers share IP addresses within 10. It seems like wireguard isn't able to create a new wireguard interface, as if the kernel module didn't systemd[1]: Starting WireGuard via wg-quick(8) for wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard: RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported: Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported: [#] ip link delete dev wg0: Cannot find device "wg0": wg-quick@wg0. Sleeping now. Here is my . So IMHO that has to be set up in the container where the physical interface is defined. this means that I can freely access the internet and I am also able to access devices on the same local network via their IP The Wireguard connection is successfully made and I am able to access all web based interfaces on the internal LAN and I can additionally access the internet. 13. com/install/#debian-module-tools. However, I'm afraid that it will The interface of your physical network is in the home assistant container - in my case it’s enp3s0 and the ip is 10. Use a userspace wireguard implementation like the one from cloud flare. 0/24 through whatever your Wireguard CIDR block is I tried to access the VPN from a laptop through a wireless hotspot on my phone. 0/24), update the IP addresses assigned on both server and client, however, on the client, in the Peer section, you should still leave 192. Problem is that the client is on a different subnet (192. You could also perhaps try with --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun --security-opt="label=disable" and that may work. I have uploaded the apollolake package manually, have ran sudo ip link add wg0 type wireguard and sudo wg which If you are new to Docker or this application our issue tracker is ONLY used for reporting bugs or requesting features. I don't have pihole and I do not have any other service using this port as far as I can see. x, VPN is 192. This is a place to discuss all of Ubiquiti's products, such as the EdgeRouter, UniFi, AirFiber, etc You will need to configure a static route on each of your LAN devices that you wish to access through the VPN. Unraid server IP : 192. I naturally setup a Wireguard tunnel with the following configuration : LAN / Home network : 192. That also is mentioned in an answer to question 56346114. Contribute to runfalk/synology-wireguard development by creating an account on GitHub. 2, so that the packets destined to your Wireguard devices from the LAN will reach the ubuntu VM and be forwarded When I connect to it from my neighborhood library WiFi, I can access all devices on my home network via IP but cannot resolve DNS. g. the main client devices which connect to it are a Windows 10 laptop and an Android phone. 44 seconds ^C[#] ip link delete dev wg0 Unable to access interface: No such device [#] ip link delete dev wg0 Cannot find device "wg0" According to the documentation - a new key-pair needs to be generated for the wireguard interface Open WireGuard and ensure that the tunnel configuration is correct. I have setup Wireguard Server on my Asus RT-AX56U and enabled intranet access on its config. I assume the length limit is inherited from Linux and some device-name length limit. My goal would be that all devices in my current network are able to access all devices in the remote network and vice looks like this: [Interface] Address = 10. I read that maybe wireguard needs to be updated so I tried to run apt update and I got the error Since updating to 6. Improve this answer. How do i allow both interfaces to work (i want the flexibility to switch between the two)? I was hoping to convert to wireguard but i've spent far too much time trying to solve this. 10 from 22. I use RDP a lot to access other computers in my apartment, like a headless raspberry pi, for There is an exception to this experience that may point to a fault with AdGuard rather than with Wireguard: Only the device that hosts the AdGuard server is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, and ICMP when using its hostname. Try reinstalling package wireguard-dkms (remove and install again). hhyzgf ktqdir kjhr kun gbwk vxqqzt cuikb ltyb toph qablm